Yes, but does risking a tipping point within the next 12 years (22, by the time we move past it?) from the much higher near term impact seem like a good idea? I

Yes, but does risking a tipping point within the next 12 years (22, by the time we move past it?) from the much higher near term impact seem like a good idea? I think the real point is to debunk natural gas as an acceptable energy source going forward. Obviously, it will take time to phase it out, but there are people out there making the argument that it's a good solution to the variability problem with renewables.