3 ms·
Achim from AirGradient here. First of all, I appreciate your openness and I hope the following helps to clarify a few things: 1) All our monitor kits are licen
by ahaucnx 3y ago
Achim from AirGradient here. First of all, I appreciate your openness and I hope the following helps to clarify a few things:
1) All our monitor kits are licensed under CC-BY-SA (and not as mentioned above CC-BY-NC). There was a short period where we had them under NC license but since NC is not truely open-source we switched to the more permissive SA license. We wrote in more detail about this on our blog [1]
2) We are aware that our open-source firmware is currently lacking the quality level we would like to see because we have been very busy with the hardware side of the project. I do hope that in the coming months we will have more time to look after the firmware side and I already had a couple of calls with contributors in the last few days who are happy to help. It's definitely an area we need to improve.
We are currently setting up a focus group and I would love to have people included that might have a more critical view on the project. Please contact me if you would be interested to participate.
[1] https://www.airgradient.com/blog/thoughts-on-licensing/ https://www.airgradient.com/blog/thoughts-on-licensing/
- loufe 3y agoAn easy first step would be to do a minimum of engagement with those people kindly putting effort into submitting PRs to the repo. You could even assign a community maintainer to help with testing and managing PRs and issues if you don't have the time.
- ahaucnx 3y agoThank you. This is a good suggestion.