3 ms·

Notion is behind a login. So not easy for everybody here to look at and discuss. If there is not a single public website out there which benefits from fronten

Notion is behind a login. So not easy for everybody here to look at and discuss. If there is not a single public website out there which benefits from frontend frameworks with data-biding components, that probably tells us something.

Pijng 3y ago
That's an interesting position. Could you explain in more detail what you mean? What is the correlation? Asking without sarcasm.
- JonathanBeuys 3y ago
  The open web is enormous. Billions of pages. If in this gigantic sample of websites, not a single one benefits from the techniques which people here describe as essential to build complex UIs - that would tell us that this is either false or that there are not complex UIs on the open web. The latter being unlikely, given the size and variety of sites out there.
  - BoorishBears 3y ago
    Your logic doesn't track. " If a V12 is so powerful, show me an economy car with a V12. If in all of the economy cars in existence, none has a V12, then either it's a false statement, or there are not V12s in economy cars. The latter being unlikely, given the size of the economy car market and the variety of models out there "
BoorishBears 3y ago
You're not familiar with Facebook? Google Docs? I mean it does tell us something they have logins: it's expensive to build complex single page applications There's no incentive to do that for free and in the open. I started my comment by explaining why you're not going to find the golden case you're digging for: even when provided you'll haughtily share how jQuery could do everything shown, and as I explained you don't see most of what is being done. Everything is easy until it's not. Maybe you should share examples of things you worked on with a larger team and show us that we're overestimating the limitations of manual state updates.

3 ms·

Notion is behind a login. So not easy for everybody here to look at and discuss. If there is not a single public website out there which benefits from fronten

by JonathanBeuys 3y ago

Pijng 3y ago
That's an interesting position. Could you explain in more detail what you mean? What is the correlation? Asking without sarcasm.
- JonathanBeuys 3y ago
  The open web is enormous. Billions of pages. If in this gigantic sample of websites, not a single one benefits from the techniques which people here describe as essential to build complex UIs - that would tell us that this is either false or that there are not complex UIs on the open web. The latter being unlikely, given the size and variety of sites out there.
  - BoorishBears 3y ago
    Your logic doesn't track. " If a V12 is so powerful, show me an economy car with a V12. If in all of the economy cars in existence, none has a V12, then either it's a false statement, or there are not V12s in economy cars. The latter being unlikely, given the size of the economy car market and the variety of models out there "
BoorishBears 3y ago
You're not familiar with Facebook? Google Docs? I mean it does tell us something they have logins: it's expensive to build complex single page applications There's no incentive to do that for free and in the open. I started my comment by explaining why you're not going to find the golden case you're digging for: even when provided you'll haughtily share how jQuery could do everything shown, and as I explained you don't see most of what is being done. Everything is easy until it's not. Maybe you should share examples of things you worked on with a larger team and show us that we're overestimating the limitations of manual state updates.