2 ms·
I mean Chess.com has made a fairly strong claim that it's not just two incidents. Also which part of the lawsuit [1] do you think was decided wrongly? [1]: ht
by lesuorac 3y ago
I mean Chess.com has made a fairly strong claim that it's not just two incidents.
Also which part of the lawsuit [1] do you think was decided wrongly?
[1]: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65592749/niemann-v-carlsen/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65592749/niemann-v-carl...
- civilitty 3y agoDid you actually read the final decision [1]? The case was dismissed by a federal court because the plaintiff failed to show a plausible Sherman Act antitrust violation and because the remaining defamation, libel, tortious interference, etc. claims should be litigated in state courts. They didn’t actually determine whether the cheating claims were true or not. They didn’t even consider the question. [1] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.moed.198608/gov.uscourts.moed.198608.149.0_1.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.moed.19...