4 ms·

Got it so we agree facial recognition will be dramatically amped up; we agree AI-based polygraphing will exist; you don’t think AI-identify-bad-intentions-butto

• robertlagrant 3y ago
  > so we agree facial recognition will be dramatically amped up It may be. Not that it will be. > we agree AI-based polygraphing will exist We didn't mention lie detecting, but no - I was saying liar detection, which was the thing from the article, also sounds like fear-mongering. > you don’t think AI-identify-bad-intentions-button exists currently Yes. > therefore we are supposed to doubt that AI is a major surveillance hazard No, that's a category error. "Major" and "hazard" are far too vague to decide upon. Will AI be used in surveillance in some capacity? Of course - it likely has been for decades, depending on how you define AI. But implying that you'll walk into a shop and be classified as a liar based on a video feed is not right. I understand websites need emotion for clicks, but I don't think it's right to do it this way.