3 ms·
Repeated use of the term "whistleblower" throughout with a trust-me-bro reference to "dozens" gives a partisan slant to this article I think; it's definitely tr
by mellosouls 3y ago
Repeated use of the term "whistleblower" throughout with a trust-me-bro reference to "dozens" gives a partisan slant to this article I think; it's definitely trying to push the narrative of cover-up.
Looking at the conspiracy-theory-friendly article history of the publication here doesn't inspire confidence either.
- madspindel 3y agoI looked into what you meant about their "conspiracy-theory-friendly article history": > People don’t trust the news media, and it’s easy to see why. Major news media organizations reported inaccurately that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. They dismissed as a “debunked conspiracy theory” the real possibility that COVID-19 could have escaped from a lab. And they have perpetuated misleading narratives around everything from rainforest destruction to biological sex to crime. > In our short history, we have broken major stories, including on: wind industry threat to North Atlantic Right Whales; government censorship of Facebook; the origins of COVID-19; the cover-up of the origins of COVID-19; the Censorship Industrial Complex; UFO/UAP whistleblowers; the World Economic Forum; San Francisco’s illegal drug consumption site; the Twitter Files and the FBI; and Paul Pelosi’s alleged attacker.
- mellosouls 3y agoYes, the usual suspects. I'm actually sympathetic to some of it, but if it makes up the bulk of a publication's (or anybody's) focus they probably need to take a break from it for their own well-being and trustworthiness.