> "there's a 70-year-long grand conspiracy to loot society and it's because men aren't men anymore", for which no charitable interpretation exists. what actual

> "there's a 70-year-long grand conspiracy to loot society and it's because men aren't men anymore", for which no charitable interpretation exists. what actually are you looking for? you want the author to challenge unregulated capitalism? to convince citizens that we’re right to reign it in, because we’re right to defend ourselves against the rapacious scammers in both the economic and political realms? because if so, just re-read the last 4 paragraphs. pay attention to the groups he calls out, and if you’re still not satisfied then explore the possible meanings of this part in particular — which he bolded — and recognize that the “weak men” here most probably includes you and i and 95% of the author’s audience. > I am full of hope that weak men will choose to reclaim their autonomy of mind