> Exempting services from data caps is not against net neutrality Erm... Exempting a service's traffic from a restriction is the literal textbook definition of

> Exempting services from data caps is not against net neutrality Erm... Exempting a service's traffic from a restriction is the literal textbook definition of 'against net neutrality' Weird misinformation here. Just to clarify for the benefit of the audience: Net Neutrality is when a carrier treats all data packets as equal, without regard to origin, destination, or provider. I believe 'fair' QoS is exempted (you're allowed to prioritise low-latency traffic such as VOIP) but only if you throw all VOIP packets into the same 'high priority' queue regardless of software, provider, destination, etc. If you charge on a per-byte basis but exempt some traffic from those charges, you're absolutely violating net neutrality. If you have a data cap but exempt some traffic from that cap, you're absolutely violating net neutrality.