4 ms·
You've left out the "unintended consequences" bit? Soil degradation at scale from fertilizer use? Ocean run off? It's time to think not how to ban the privacy-
by bamboozled 3y ago
You've left out the "unintended consequences" bit? Soil degradation at scale from fertilizer use? Ocean run off?
It's time to think not how to ban the privacy-invading AI (it will never work), but how to have a smaller footprint that may be used to invade your privacy, and, most importantly, how to run things in such.a way that invading your privacy is not profitable, even though still possible. And, inevitably, learn to live with even less privacy by default.
When 50%+ of the cars driving around your city are Google / Waymo cars which are essentially intelligence gathering tanks with unparalleled surveillance capability, I don't see how anyone is going to be reducing any footprints ? Cashless society? Home assistant robots that "phone home"? Face it, this is not going to be getting better anytime soon. We can try adapt all we like but maybe we should just be walking around with EMP emitting back packs on if we care about our privacy?