4 ms·
I think people do a disservice to their cause when they make semantic arguments like this. Isn't enough to say that AI can be used for enhanced surveillance by
by imgabe 3y ago
I think people do a disservice to their cause when they make semantic arguments like this.
Isn't enough to say that AI can be used for enhanced surveillance by malicious actors? What does it mean to be a "surveillance technology"? Now you have people arguing about whether AI fits the definition of this made up term instead of talking about the potentially nefarious surveillance applications.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- DrScientist 3y agoI think she is pointing out there is a bit of a vicious cycle. AI needs data [1], so in the end people compete on the data - this drives more and more surveillance type behaviour - including using AI to collect data [2]. [1] not controversial I hope [2] eg face recognition, identification by joining the dots from traded data. It's not necessarily nefarious per se - just the dynamic - and once the data is out there....
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]