4 ms·
Maybe your understanding would benefit from referring to their actual doctrine: https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/russian-military-strategy-core-tenets
by helpfulContrib 3y ago
Maybe your understanding would benefit from referring to their actual doctrine:
https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/russian-military-strategy-core-tenets-and-operational-concepts.pdf https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/russian-military-s...
- _kbh_ 3y agoWhat part of there doctrine says to reactivate T55/T54/T62's and to weld a random assortment of rocket systems to MTLBs in some sort of slightly more advanced technical?.
- helpfulContrib 3y ago"The important part is that there is no scientific basis for Russia fielding old T-62/T-55s and in fact Russia is verifiably fielding three times more T-90Ms than before." https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/analysis-of-ukraines-escalating-crimean https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/analysis-of-ukraines-esc... The doctrine you are looking for is propaganda...
- _kbh_ 3y agoBut they have literally fielded BMPT's, T90's and S400's. They are literally fielding there latest stuff
- helpfulContrib 3y agoSo .. what is it .. they're fielding junk because they have no new stuff, or they're fielding new stuff, and its effective? Keep in mind, the Russians are quite capable of replacing every tank lost .. https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/analysis-of-ukraines-escalating-crimean https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/analysis-of-ukraines-esc...
- _kbh_ 3y ago> So .. what is it .. they're fielding junk because they have no new stuff, or they're fielding new stuff, and its effective? They have limited new stuff and they are fielding literally mad max'esuqe technicals. > Keep in mind, the Russians are quite capable of replacing every tank lost .. And yet russia is fielding T55's/T54's and T62's. > https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/analysis-of-ukraines-esc https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/analysis-of-ukraines-esc... I cannot take this source seriously when it just repeats what TASS says. They are claiming that this Subarmine. https://news.yahoo.com/pictures-emerge-damaged-russian-submarine-112507896.html https://news.yahoo.com/pictures-emerge-damaged-russian-subma... Is not going to have any increased repair time compared to when it didn't have two gaping holes in it?. Thats obviously not true. On second look this source is literally just Russian propaganda. > I had forgotten to post this a while back. Ukrainian journalist Roman Revedzhuk who had previously run for office and was involved in Ukrainian politics for a long time revealed that he had received an insider report from the SBU that Ukraine had more than 310,000 KIA as of July: Who would believe such obvious nonsense?.
- pohl 3y agohelpfulContrib, an account that was green just last week, sure seems to post a lot of things that Vlad would like “get out there”.
- helpfulContrib 3y agoHey, that's rather discriminating.
- _kbh_ 3y ago> "The important part is that there is no scientific basis for Russia fielding old T-62/T-55s and in fact Russia is verifiably fielding three times more T-90Ms than before." This is verifiably false, theres plenty of images of T-62's in Ukraine with Russian markings and with Russian style anti drone / RPG cages ontop of them. You can find images of ~80 captured / destroyed Russian T-62's here. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-docum...