Are you returning that judgement as a function of the submission title (which apparently rewrites between «gossip» and attention calling an original note, «AI i

Are you returning that judgement as a function of the submission title (which apparently rewrites between «gossip» and attention calling an original note, «AI is a way, I think, to entrench and expand the surveillance business model»), of Coldewey's summary of the interview, of the interview itself ( https://youtu.be/amNriUZNP8w https://youtu.be/amNriUZNP8w ), of the paper that is the occasion for the interview (it must be Open (For Business): Big Tech, Concentrated Power, and the Political Economy of Open AI - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4543807 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4543807 )...? Whittaker's point is about a certain cone of issues. Her position was previously exposed at least at https://slate.com/technology/2023/05/meredith-whittaker-interview-geoffrey-hinton-ai-threats.html https://slate.com/technology/2023/05/meredith-whittaker-inte...