3 ms·
Yup. I'm going with the "filtering" theory as per the above comments, but with a twist. Getting older and wiser is a bit like Bill Hicks' definition of getting
by nonrandomstring 3y ago
Yup. I'm going with the "filtering" theory as per the above comments,
but with a twist. Getting older and wiser is a bit like Bill Hicks'
definition of getting high: "When you're high, you can do everything
you normally do just as well - you just realize that it's not worth
the fucking effort."
At 20 I'd stay up for 72 hours very badly writing a full featured text
editor in the one language I knew, C. That giddy, naive excitement was
the engine. Most of my ideas were stupid. I had no measure of my
abilities or time, and so optimistically threw myself into projects.
At 35 I had a choice of more than 10 programming languages I knew
well, but used someone else's libraries to hack what I needed together
in Perl in an hour. That was probably "peak hacker".
By 40 I figured out I could just customise Emacs with a line of elisp.
At 50 I figured: if it's not already an obvious feature or extension
then I'm probably misunderstanding what I think I want.
Wisdom frees up time and effort to focus on innovations which are
grander/complex, happen on a slower timescale, need more help and
collaboration with others, require more reflective thought, and have
to be matched to my known abilities and time.