5 ms·
Well they are less productive that's for sure. There are old people who still win nobel prizes because they've kept up their productivity.
by oreally 3y ago
Well they are less productive that's for sure. There are old people who still win nobel prizes because they've kept up their productivity.
- hef19898 3y agoThat's disputable, to put it mildly.
- oreally 3y agoDo many of them not have responsibilities that take away from their productivity? There is the one rare older folk that has the perfect circumstances, but I'm talking macro scale here.
- hef19898 3y agoProductivity =|= hours present at work (office or remote) But don't worry, once you hit 30 you will realize that as well.
- oreally 3y agoIt's funny that you assume that 1) I'm < 30 and 2) that I assume productivity = hours. Instead of cute quips, how about you tell me where I'm wrong? Or are you not able to?
- hef19898 3y agoIf productivity doesn't equal hours, please explain how a family, assuming that to be the main difference between young and old, would have any impact on productivity then. Obviously so, with experience people are less likely to fall for productivity porn and are less likely to be abused by companies asking for 60 hour weeks, crunch time and the like.
- oreally 3y agoWell you're the one who made the statement productivity =|= hours, maybe you can explain it better than me. What's your position? That productivity is not affected by having a family?
- hef19898 3y agoHours are affected. Since hours are not really related to productivity, a family is not impacting it. Feel free to look up yourself why measuring hours is the worst way to estimate productivity.
- oreally 3y agoI've never said hours = productivity, don't assume I've said it. It's in your head. > Hours are affected. Since hours are not really related to productivity, a family is not impacting it. You've looking from the lens of a male leaving all the childcare and planning to his wife or someone else. That's a very privileged background.