3 ms·
The first point is incorrect IMO. They just needed a really solid core of unjanky physics for an MVP, which was why a sequel was needed in the first place - KSP
by hoseja 3y ago
The first point is incorrect IMO. They just needed a really solid core of unjanky physics for an MVP, which was why a sequel was needed in the first place - KSP 1 engine limitations. Couldn't even deliver that.