> it's easy to see the differences in quality generation over generation. I don't think it said otherwise, in fact he acknowledged it He is railing against th

> it's easy to see the differences in quality generation over generation. I don't think it said otherwise, in fact he acknowledged it He is railing against the ISP imposing QoS on your network via WiFi. (How that happens is not clear - but the Qualcomm marketing he quotes seems to imply they will do it with WiFi 7.) QoS which can be thought of the reverse of net neutrality and it's being done inside your home to boot. Handing over QoS inside your home to your ISP does sound scary. What happens next - they sell favoured access to your WiFi speeds to people like Google and Amazon? Like you said he brings up all sorts of arguments, one being we have so much bandwidth now we don't need it. That one didn't make a lot of sense, given his favoured solution was to let the customers handle their own QoS (somehow). To be honest it all sounded a bit far fetched to me. But back to your point - it wasn't a rail against WiFi 7.