3 ms·

Can you be more specific?

• mellosouls 3y ago
  I think it's pretty clear. If I start pointing fingers it starts an argument. Tbh I'm suspicious of your inability to find them yourself or your quest for examples. It's a bit sealiony.
  • dventimi 3y ago
    Suit yourself. I'm not going to make your case for you.
    • mellosouls 3y ago
      Thankfully, "making my case" for a standard definition is not something I need to do. It's very basic stuff. If you are unable to work it out from the original link and description I gave or the previous reply, I think any more effort on my part will be a pointless time sink.
      • dventimi 3y ago
        No, you do need to make your case--i.e. mount an argument based on evidence and reason--if you want me to believe "scientism" is real. That it has a "standard definition" is not enough. After all, you can look up in any dictionary the standard definitions for other things that are also not real, like clairvoyance, telekinesis, and palmistry. Until you or someone else does make a case, I'm going to continue believing scientism is little more than a cry from charlatans who lost the attention of their audience.