3 ms·

> then what? Then it us a "simulation". "Pixels" of reality rendering.

• lmm 3y ago
  And? That doesn't explain anything. What rules is the "simulation" following? If it's not following any, how come reality behaves so consistently in most respects?
  • _8j50 3y ago
    Simulation theory is not my invention, actual scientists have tested it and theorized with strong evidence. I would answer your question but not worth the downvotes like my original comment.
    • gus_massa 3y ago
      I don't remember any evidence supporting the simulation theory. Do you have a link?
      • _8j50 3y ago
        I wouldn't say empirical evidence but here is one of many that keeps popping up in popsci news: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/confirmed-we-live-in-a-simulation/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/confirmed-we-live...
        • gus_massa 3y ago
          That sounds good, but after reading it carefully it makes no sense. It was posted in April 1 2021.
        • tsimionescu 3y ago
          That article is an April Fools joke. The simulation hypothesis is nothing except sciencey-sounding creationism/dualism.