> Apparently a fact you like repeating ;-) Yeah, I really find it interesting. It's so modern, almost like something from cybernetics. It reminds me of how G

> Apparently a fact you like repeating ;-) Yeah, I really find it interesting. It's so modern, almost like something from cybernetics. It reminds me of how Gurdjieff said that the "atom" of a phenomenon was the smallest amount of it that evinces all of its qualities. It only took seven years to get a thoughtful reply. Cheers! :) > Would you happen to know where Bruno said this I originally read it in one of Robert Anton Wilson's books (or possible a foreword he wrote for some other book that he didn't write, which probably isn't helpful.) I have no idea where he got it. Certainly money in practice and theory has become much more complex than it was five hundred years ago when he (might have) said it. I should tell you that when it comes to economics I'm basically a troglodyte. I feel higher economics is actually a form of numerology. I won't be offended if you decline to discuss it further with me. :)