2 ms·
Frankly, these don't sound any better than Google Cloud's TTS, and is orders of magnitude more expensive.
by BeetleB 3y ago
Frankly, these don't sound any better than Google Cloud's TTS, and is orders of magnitude more expensive.
- ameliaquining 3y agoI think the killer feature here is supposed to be voice cloning, which IIUC Google Cloud offers only as a custom enterprise thing that takes weeks (which suggests that it's not fully automated).
- BeetleB 3y agoCloning is nice, but what's the point if it doesn't sound natural? Will people really pay 100-1000x (if not more) just to get their preferred voice, but won't sound anything like that person when speaking?
- vmatsiiako 3y agoIt does sounds pretty good though. Plus, I think it’s more like 2-3x, not 1000x
- BeetleB 3y ago> Plus, I think it’s more like 2-3x, not 1000x The most expensive Google Cloud option[1] gives 100,000 bytes free per month. This gives 10,000 chars per month. The next tier is $5/month. With Google that gives you over 130K bytes. And that's the most expensive model. With the moderately priced model $5 gives you 1.3M bytes. With the cheapest model you get 5.25M bytes. I use their service, so I know the economics. I pay nothing per month because I use the intermediate model, and I don't need more than 1M bytes per month. Switching to this, I will have to pay at least $5/month for a voice that's not really any better than Google's. [1] https://cloud.google.com/text-to-speech/pricing https://cloud.google.com/text-to-speech/pricing