I've seen a ton of press from Mozilla recently and none of it has been about Firefox. It's all been shitty virtue signaling like this. I don't give a shit abou

I've seen a ton of press from Mozilla recently and none of it has been about Firefox. It's all been shitty virtue signaling like this. I don't give a shit about Mozilla's lofty ideals when they aren't actually doing anything to achieve them. I disliked Mozilla enough years ago to switch to chrome and now that I want to get rid of chrome I have no other options. It seems clear that Mozilla doesn't care to or feel the need to actually improve the product. They'll continue to exist because they must so why bother with a product? Yeah sure, just blow a ton of money on some modern art exhibit why not? God, it's bad enough that we have a chrome monopoly. Does Mozilla really have to be actively shitty in response? Why can't we have an actually good alternative?