3 ms·
> despite repeated calls from stake holders Last time I checked it was a small organisation run by 2 or 3 people with no real standing to speak for anyone but
by arp242 3y ago
> despite repeated calls from stake holders
Last time I checked it was a small organisation run by 2 or 3 people with no real standing to speak for anyone but themselves. And AFAIK that was also the only time a major objection was raised.
And look, if you dislike the name then by all means voice your objections and let's have the discussion. I dislike the reactionary "STFU" response, which just shuts every discussion down. What I also dislike is this kind of pretence, which also shuts down the discussion.
- jszymborski 3y agoI don't recall tell anyone to STFU, I'm just doing what you said, voicing my objections. The brand is tarnished in my eyes by their use of the name of a first nation. I think your comment is pretty good evidence that I haven't shut down any discussion, I just know where I stand on the matter.
- worthless-trash 3y agoI just realised this now, technically every race/group is the name of a first nation.