There's a lot that we force the market to do that's not a market derived solution. Slaves are very market efficient. Racketeering can be too. You can make choic

There's a lot that we force the market to do that's not a market derived solution. Slaves are very market efficient. Racketeering can be too. You can make choices of long-term benefits of not choosing a purely free market solution. What I meant though is that the veto may be simple opposition to the idea, or it may come from having a special interests of tech corps influencing that decision - given popular acceptance of the proposed law, that would make it corrupt regulatory capture.