4 ms·
That's too bad. I use it. It's typically faster than their "modern" interface, and does not suffer from "flat design".
by bediger4000 3y ago
That's too bad. I use it. It's typically faster than their "modern" interface, and does not suffer from "flat design".
- dangus 3y agoIt falls in a weird technological in-between. If you need good performance and highly efficient data usage on a spotty or non-existent connection, a POP email client is the way to go. The basic HTML site has zero advantages in comparison. If you have access to a half decent web browser, chances are it’s perfectly capable of running the JavaScript mobile version. Sure, it runs JavaScript, but it’s not exactly heavy.