3 ms·
I think trial and error at first. We'd probably find out that states cover most of these redundant tasks and federal employment is a giant welfare grift for wor
by Eumenes 3y ago
I think trial and error at first. We'd probably find out that states cover most of these redundant tasks and federal employment is a giant welfare grift for workers, and does not benefit the citizen/taxpayers. For example, we pretty much have 50 Department of Educations for each state + the Federal agency. Seems like a big waste to me. Def benefits the federal workers and their nice benefit/pension packages. Also, they're unionized, which is unjust to the taxpayer.
I'd rather have that money stay within the states so they can choose how to use it. As a bonus, if federal income tax was eliminated, people would have more money in their pockets and taxes could be exercised locally/statewide, vs administered in DC, by out of touch advisors.