3 ms·
Controversial take, but if the public is paying your salary to represent them, both you and your spouse should be under greater scrutiny so they know whose inte
by Johnny555 3y ago
Controversial take, but if the public is paying your salary to represent them, both you and your spouse should be under greater scrutiny so they know whose interests you're really representing.
The need to disclose spousal information may dissuade some (maybe many) from public service, but that doesn't necessarily seem like a bad thing.
- mschuster91 3y agoPunish corruption, violations of transparency laws and not disclosing lobbying contacts in public by a 10 year minimum prison sentence for involved persons and a 50% worldwide income fine of the parent company for involved companies, and provide a bounty of 10 million dollars + 20% of the fines levied and complete immunity for whistleblowers... It's a matter of incentives in the end, I prefer adjusting these over complicated bullshit regarding "insider" trading rules that's constantly gamed anyway because it has no real teeth attached.