3 ms·

> as a bonus, it is easy to understand how that share was derived. so it is implicitly fair. I don't think I understand this. How does something being simple t

• catchnear4321 3y ago
  because the corporation made the math simple. simple is fair, and honest, an honesty we can all understand.
  • araes 3y ago
    And of course simple math is fair, which is why I have submitted millions of images to Getty Images in massive waves, because of course such a fair algorithm will find your image among my stack of millions. And when we grind out compensation, I get 1,000,000/1,000,001 and you get 1/1,000,001. Because of course I would never game your fair algorithm.
    • Aerroon 3y ago
      But then your images contributed 99.9999% of the training data. Getty has a vested interest in removing "polluting" images from the dataset. The model would be almost entirely, if not entirely, on your images.
      • catchnear4321 3y ago
        modern problems require modern solutions. a company could always train a model on what constitutes a low value or malicious image. submissions get screened by the bouncer before going on to integration with the commercial model. throw in a submission fee, and enough of the malicious submissions will be stopped to plausibly call this solved. plus, new cash stream.