> I've felt for a long time (maybe even a decade) that Apache is the place OSS goes to retire/die. It's a bit too strong as others have pointed out that there

> I've felt for a long time (maybe even a decade) that Apache is the place OSS goes to retire/die. It's a bit too strong as others have pointed out that there are very active projects under the Apache umbrella. But I do feel that there's a core of truth in this. Specifically, Apache does appear to provide a "way out" for large enterprise customers that want to dump non-strategic (to them) code somewhere and not necessarily invest in it. Seems something that could be solvable on the ASF side by having additional criteria before accepting projects, and maybe require a certain level of activity for continued membership.