4 ms·
Exactly this! This is my experience also. Your point about "well covered & non-controversial" is spot on. I know not to expect great results when asking abou
by doug_durham 3y ago
Exactly this! This is my experience also. Your point about "well covered & non-controversial" is spot on. I know not to expect great results when asking about topics that have very little coverage. To be honest I wouldn't expect to go to an arbitrary human and get solid answers on a little covered topic, unless that person just happened to be topic expert. There is so much value in having the basics to intermediate levels of topics covered in a reliable way. That's where most of commercial activity occurs.
- jabradoodle 3y agoI think a key difference is that humans very rarely sound convincing talking about subjects they have no clue about. I've seen the hallucination rate of LLMs improve significantly, if you stick to well covered topics they probably do quite well. The issue is they often have no tells when making things up.