3 ms·
I knew it was going to be a disaster as soon it became obvious that it was a continuation of the old code base, which has a lot of fundamental issues.
by TylerE 3y ago
I knew it was going to be a disaster as soon it became obvious that it was a continuation of the old code base, which has a lot of fundamental issues.
- mattsan 3y agoThis is the first time I'm hearing it uses the old code base - do you have a source? I thought in the initial marketing they were big on saying it's a full rewrite.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoYou'd think if they were using the old code base they'd have more of the old features.
- eterm 3y agoIt might not use literal code (although it might), but there's definitely signs that some things like the terrain system were cribbed from KSP1, complete with the limitations of that system. Which means they've ended up in an awful state where even if they were competant (which they are not), best case things might not be much better. You're right they marketed it as a full re-write to avoid the problems ("Slay the Kraken"), but what was delivered was trash.
- gs17 3y agoI'm pretty sure it's not using much if any of the old code given how many bugs it had/has that don't exist in KSP1.