> I agree that assuming that someone doesn't understand something is generally considered rude. I think assuming that someone doesn't understand something is

> I agree that assuming that someone doesn't understand something is generally considered rude. I think assuming that someone doesn't understand something is only rude if there are no indicators for a misunderstanding. javcasas seemed to assume that TylerE doesn't understand Monads because TylerE stated that there is a Monad insanity in Haskell to replicate a print statement. I would also assume javcasas' comment wasn't made in good faith, but I still don't see that an insult was voiced. Not every rudeness can be interpreted as an insult I think