2 ms·
Or "levels" are a low-granularity schema that can't box in how people actually work in their jobs. The reality is that every person working in a position bring
by cmrdporcupine 3y ago
Or "levels" are a low-granularity schema that can't box in how people actually work in their jobs.
The reality is that every person working in a position brings different things to the table. While larger businesses create defined level boxes and paths, they're really very rough and imprecise ways to describe people and often do a disservice to people who work hard but not in the way that the boxes "expect."
So there are definitely cases when we see people's compensation out of sync with their level (in either direction) and it's sometimes a product of the company recognizing the value of an employee but having levels and tiers that don't match the employee exactly.
Some companies, for example, tie higher pay to a management/leadership ladder. But you can be a solid-contributing or 10x or whatever software developer without going down the leadership road.
- sarchertech 3y agoSure they are low granularity. But one person making 3x what another of the same level does goes way behind a rough and imprecise description. That’s a complete breakdown of a level system.