3 ms·
Pay for the Plus version. Then it makes stuff up far less frequently. If the next version has the same step up in performance, I will no longer consider inacc
by londons_explore 3y ago
Pay for the Plus version.
Then it makes stuff up far less frequently.
If the next version has the same step up in performance, I will no longer consider inaccuracy an issue - even the best books have mistakes in them, they just need to be infrequent enough.
- nerdbert 3y ago> Pay for the Plus version. > Then it makes stuff up far less frequently. Now there's a business model for a ChatGPT-like service. $1/month: Almost always wrong $10/month: 50/50 chance of being right or wrong $100/month: right 95% of the time
- TeMPOraL 3y agoYou make it sound like business shenanigans, but the truth is, it's a natural fit for now, as performance of LLMs improves with their size, but costs of training (up-front investment) and inference (marginal, per-query) also go up.
- md5wasp 3y agoPay for the $1/month version and invert the responses; now you have the $100/month one for cheap :D