> The sad thing is technologically their argument was 100% bulletproof Engineers often think the law is a computer program. You put the same inputs in and get

> The sad thing is technologically their argument was 100% bulletproof Engineers often think the law is a computer program. You put the same inputs in and get the same inputs out. If you find a bug, then you can exploit that until the bug is fixed via a new version. It's not. The spirit of what the law is supposed to do is far more important than the letter of the law.