3 ms·
Nothing. Adding 2FA codes to logins costs money, and self-hosting is deliberately difficult so you’ll be using the cloud. Also you can’t edit while offline.
by antioxidant 3y ago
Nothing. Adding 2FA codes to logins costs money, and self-hosting is deliberately difficult so you’ll be using the cloud.
Also you can’t edit while offline.
- vincentkriek 3y agoSelf hosting is incredibly easy with vaultwarden (https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden)
- LinAGKar 3y agoThat's a different implementation though
- vincentkriek 3y agoA different implementation for the server though, not the clients. So, as a user you wouldn't see the difference. And as an admin it's much easier to maintain.
- ghosty141 3y agoTheoretically yes but its comptible with the official cliente like the iOS app so it practically works the same.
- r4indeer 3y ago> Adding 2FA codes to logins costs money If you don't want to pay $10/year for Premium, you can still host Vaultwarden instead and get the features for free. > self-hosting is deliberately difficult so you'll be using the cloud [citation needed] in my opinion. Yes, the current self-hosting method is rather complex, but still not that difficult to set up. Just follow their guide. They are even working on a new "unified" deployment method [1] where you can choose your own DB and all the Bitwarden containers are merged into one. The resulting docker-compose.yml looks as simple as any other service I self-host. Why would they do this if what you said were true? [1] https://bitwarden.com/help/install-and-deploy-unified-beta/ https://bitwarden.com/help/install-and-deploy-unified-beta/