3 ms·

Well, London have over 8m people compared to second on the list, Birminghamn with slightly over 2m. It's pretty obvious you need to spend a ton on public commu

• switch007 3y ago
  That’s an argument for spending elsewhere, not London. London is already busy and crowded. I’m pretty tired of this belief that it wasn’t investment that made London the economic giant it is - it infects even the DfT and treasury. Invest properly in other cities and they will be equally prosperous.
  • hkt 3y ago
    It didn't infect the treasury, it originated there. The treasury is a deeply broken institution, and it has always been resistant to losing "turf". In the 1960s Harold Wilson's administration tried to split its functions: the new Department for Economic Affairs would take the long view, and the treasury's job was to take the short view and deal with the markets. From what I recall reading (source needed, it was a long time ago and I forget the book) it was not just ministerial infighting that caused the problem: civil servants in the treasury didn't want to lose out to the DEA either. It is always helpful to recall that the four great offices of state are, especially at the upper echelons, ancient institutions whose cultures are unlike anything most of us have experienced.