3 ms·
It's actually 33% per the end of his article. The 25% comes from his first tweet, which he states was in error.
by SeanLuke 3y ago
It's actually 33% per the end of his article. The 25% comes from his first tweet, which he states was in error.
- speps 3y agoIt's not an error, it's 25% in one direction and 33% in the other. I think what he meant is that he should have tweeted the bigger number, for clickbait. He also gives a reasonable explanation of why, but nobody who read his original tweet is going to read it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]