3 ms·
"Role players will not discuss law enforcement concerns on social media or provide guidance to each other if confronted by an officer. Also, they will have no d
by slavboj 3y ago
"Role players will not discuss law enforcement concerns on social media or provide guidance to each other if confronted by an officer. Also, they will have no demonstrated interest in criminal cases involving claims of LARP."
Your resistance proves your guilt. Insisting on your fourth and fifth amendment rights? Noting other cases where innocent hobbyists were threatened and trying to avoid the same? Seems like violent extremism.
- seventytwo 3y agoOh come on… it’s a hueristic, like anything else.
- slavboj 3y agoI have a heuristic that guidance that amounts to "assertion of rights is a sign of guilt" is presumptively invalid.
- seventytwo 3y agoYou understand the difference between correlations and causations, right? Because that’s what this boils down to.
- DoreenMichele 3y agoI didn't interpret it that way at all. I interpreted it as having familiarity with cases of actual terrorists using a defense of claimed LARPing suggests you researched this to make up a cover story.
- PixyMisa 3y agoMore like the FBI created a huge splash when it funded, planned, and led the Whitmer kidnapping plot.
- jrflowers 3y ago> Insisting on your fourth and fifth amendment rights? This is a good point. When I am in character as a LARP law enthusiast that’s LARPing as a violent extremist, my in-character explanation of why I am not criminally liable for my OC’s OC’s behavior to police are a violation of my rights.
- H8crilA 3y agoYour rights do not depend on you being "in character" or not. The only state of mind that affects your rights is insanity. Insert the meme about "finding out".