5 ms·
You were downvoted because your comment showed you didn't read the OP article, which answers your question thoroughly
by VHRanger 3y ago
You were downvoted because your comment showed you didn't read the OP article, which answers your question thoroughly
- lisper 3y agoBut it doesn't. It makes the unsubstantiated claim that shaken baby syndrome is junk science. It isn't. It's a real thing, at least according to the Mayo Clinic, which I consider more trustworthy on this topic than The Guardian. It may well be that the evidence for SBS in this particular case was bogus, but it does not follow that SBS is bogus in general.