4 ms·
Thank you for collecting this. A couple years to draft & study some proposed regulation doesn't seem that heinous to me. It would make sense to not hastily publ
by bagels 3y ago
Thank you for collecting this. A couple years to draft & study some proposed regulation doesn't seem that heinous to me. It would make sense to not hastily publish a regulation that will last decades without really considering it and its effects well. They can be a source of lawsuits, and I would assume, you want it to be effective which can take some study.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- flangola7 3y agoNo, the delay was artificial. Consider the effects? How about the possibility delaying i needlessly ncreases the number of humans dying?
- username332211 3y agoThe refusal of politicians to mandate motorcycle helmets for car drivers and pedestrians needlessly increases the number of humans dying as well. Since the article is referring to "83 cases among countertop workers identified across the state [of California] since 2019", it's almost certain helmets would save more lives than anything you do about engineered stone. So what's the excuse there?
- flangola7 3y agoSorry, I'm confused, where did motorcycles come into this discussion?
- bagels 3y agoThere are already regulations requiring ppe and ventilation that aren't followed, they are already dying despite regulations. I'm not saying that we need more delays. I'm also not saying that there isn't room for more regulation here, but just slapping any poorly considered regulation down may not solve the problem.
- zopa 3y agoThese are regulations that have already been studied extensively at the agency level. OIRA’s cost-benefit analysis is a second layer of review on top of that. It’d be interesting to see a cost-benefit analysis of OIRA’s cost-benefit analysis. All the delays aren’t free.