3 ms·
Boring. It's not WYSIWYG at all. Boring: It just shows the rendered markdown next to the raw markdown. More interesting would be a solution that uses the sam
by webjprgm 15y ago
Boring. It's not WYSIWYG at all.
Boring: It just shows the rendered markdown next to the raw markdown. More interesting would be a solution that uses the same space to show the rendered form and for user input. E.g. as you type "cool" the asterisks disappear and instead you see the italicized word.
Not WYSIWYG: What-you-see-is-what-you-get means you visually present to the user all the options available. The user should not have to happen to know a set of magic incantations. Markdown requires magic incantations. Some users know them, many users do not. If you want to eliminate toolbar buttons, do something like iOS where when you highlight a word you get hovering format buttons.
- webjprgm 15y agoOh, never mind. I was confused, I thought I was suppose to type in the raw Markdown source area and didn't realize that the rendered markdown area was the editor. Sorry. Yeah, the floating toolbar like iOS. Cool stuff. I won't know if it's really useable for me until I try writing one of my reports in it. (One of my team's tools uses Markdown to generate emailed reports. It can be painful sometimes.)