4 ms·
This sounds like great additional protection, but I would still like to brush and floss to get the remaining food grime out of my mouth. Meaning it really doesn
by jackblemming 3y ago
This sounds like great additional protection, but I would still like to brush and floss to get the remaining food grime out of my mouth. Meaning it really doesn’t change my life all that much.
It would certainly be a game changer for lower income families.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- jfengel 3y agoGood choice. Gingivitis is a deeper problem than cavities. Without your gums you lose not just your teeth, but it can become a systemic infection. And it's much harder to fix than a cavity.
- kelnos 3y agoI don't think anyone is suggesting this would replace brushing and flossing. Plenty of people still have problems with cavities, despite taking good care of their teeth (seems genetics plays an outsized role in tooth/gum health). Not having to worry about cavities would likely be of great value to them.