This is exactly the "censorship" the right obsesses about. Not the real kind, as in the examples you cited. What they want is the ability to make any claim they

This is exactly the "censorship" the right obsesses about. Not the real kind, as in the examples you cited. What they want is the ability to make any claim they want with zero support, and when asked for any "turn the tables" by putting the entire burden on their interlocutor - who might, as in this case, have met it already. They call denial of that "censorship" even if it very much isn't. That's just giving zero credence to zero proof or effort. They need periodic reminders that the right to speak freely does not include the right to be heard, believed, or even taken seriously. It's only censorship when you can't speak even on your own platform.