You describe using disability as a tool: >it's the only tool we have that has enough moral and legal backing to make companies deliver more value I describe y

You describe using disability as a tool: >it's the only tool we have that has enough moral and legal backing to make companies deliver more value I describe your use of disability as a moral and legal baseball bat (tool). Speak softly and carry a big stick: the big stick is disability protections. Using disability as an moral and legal offensive weapon incentivises companies to erode the rights of disabled people and prevent the advancement of new rights. Sure, some product somewhere is temporarily friendlier to disabled people: and the world will remain blind to the advantages that disabled people can bring to the table. The system will continue to design poor products with a veneer of usability, technically meeting moral and legal requirements instead of failing like it should. Nothing will change for the better. Disability as a baseball bat is simply the only tool that you're familiar with using, because it is easy to use.