4 ms·
Well, yes, the actual monitor is the only exception. Although low refresh rate never looked different than high to me, it somehow felt worse. On CRT monitors I
by qwerty456127 3y ago
Well, yes, the actual monitor is the only exception. Although low refresh rate never looked different than high to me, it somehow felt worse. On CRT monitors I have tried 60 Hz (looks Okay but feels unpleasant), 85 Hz (totally Ok), 100 Hz (no difference from 75 Hz). On LCD displays I tried 60 Hz (perfectly Okay, what I consider the norm), 75 Hz and 100 Hz and both felt no different from 60 Hz - I would never be able to distinguish. I may confuse 75 with 85 and 100 with 120 - I can't remember what exactly that was clearly. So a 75-85 Hz CRT or a 60 Hz LCD feels like what I need. Less is worse, more makes no difference.
But this is about the physical refresh rate of the display. What I meant in the previous comment is about the rendering FPS a program would produce.