I agree this is a good approach for any open source project leader to have. It's valuable to let rookies argue small debates so they can learn the ropes and ge

I agree this is a good approach for any open source project leader to have. It's valuable to let rookies argue small debates so they can learn the ropes and get a feel for the community; it's even more valuable for the veterans and leadership to make decisions, set priorities, and maintain focus on what's important. Both are necessary to grow and sustain an open community project. You bring people in and get them engaged whilst reinforcing what the project is focused on, its tone, style, and mission. Making a decision civilly, whether everyone agrees or not, is very reassuring to newcomers and oldtimers alike. It proves that the community is fun and worthwhile.