3 ms·
Didn’t miss much. It’s very long and mostly complains about copywrite and applying traditional ethics.
by SV_BubbleTime 3y ago
Didn’t miss much. It’s very long and mostly complains about copywrite and applying traditional ethics.
- ds42 3y agoThe irony being that it would have massively benefitted from a huge range of ML tools, be it the crusty audio or the atrocious pacing. But I mean... same deal as every day, pop-luddites squeezing their audiences for subscribers (another bout of irony because they accuse "AI" to do the same, somehow). It's still fascinating and good to see that we get some lengthy essays about this, I can't wait for us to discuss how well it's aged in one or two years or so.
- karmakurtisaani 3y agoTraditional ethics? Is there some modern non-traditional ethics these days as well?
- SV_BubbleTime 3y agoRead it together, traditional copywrite ethics.
- karmakurtisaani 3y agoBut what's the traditional part? Training models with other people's work without credit or pay is ok by some new form of ethics now? It's almost like you want to say it's unethical to do so, but want to side step the issue altogether at the same time.
- SV_BubbleTime 3y agoThe way we have traditionally thought about copywrite has not necessarily taken into account the immediacy and effortlessness of derivatives. It’s just different now, and we don’t really understand what this is going to mean going forward.