3 ms·
There are many varied and systemic reasons, from supply chain, to mass consumer behaviour, politics, battery technology, access to minerals and the sheer insane
by yawaramin 3y ago
There are many varied and systemic reasons, from supply chain, to mass consumer behaviour, politics, battery technology, access to minerals and the sheer insane scale of mining that we would need to ramp up to, to meet the demands of electrifying even a fraction of today's ICEs. This article explains it pretty well: https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-ev-transition-explained-2659316104 https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-ev-transition-explained-265931...
> “EVs,” notes King, “pull an invisible trailer filled with required major lifestyle changes that the public is not yet aware of.”
>
> When it does, do not expect the public to acquiesce quietly.
To electrify any significant proportion of ICEs you will need to massively ramp up mining in developing countries. This is going to crush their populations like a meat grinder at the same time that it blights their ecologies with the after-effects of mining. It's a new colonialism with a race to acquire resources for EVs: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2023/ev-cobalt-mines-congo/?tid=ss_tw https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2023/ev-cob...
- scubbo 3y agoA _significantly_ more helpful comment - thank you!
- abenga 3y agoFossil fuel mining has had the same effects, e.g. Shell's shenanigans in Nigeria, Angola's general malaise, the mishmash of autocratic monarchies in the ME, their effects on air quality everywhere, … yet somehow they get a pass and are regarded as a given.
- yawaramin 3y agoI don't give fossil fuel mining a pass. I advocate for mining a much more energy-dense mineral, which has an order of magnitude less impact on the population and ecology.