2 ms·
The important thing isn't that everyone can read it, it's that everyone can not read it. I think that limiting the freedom of speech based purely on speech whic
by Locke1689 15y ago
The important thing isn't that everyone can read it, it's that everyone can not read it. I think that limiting the freedom of speech based purely on speech which one can easily opt out of is pretty reprehensible.
- ugh 15y agoIt’s still public speech, though, and not in any way personal. I was responding to a comment that the government reading twitter and blogs is akin to reading emails which is total bullshit.
- Locke1689 15y agoTrue -- but what about mailing lists which can be publicly accessed? There's no "broadcast", but there's no protection either.