4 ms·
> verge of misinformation/pseudoscience. Yeah one was 5G. I did not like she didn’t cut off speculation and stopped watching her videos afterwards. But ultimat
by dzhiurgis 3y ago
> verge of misinformation/pseudoscience.
Yeah one was 5G. I did not like she didn’t cut off speculation and stopped watching her videos afterwards. But ultimately she is correct - there just isn’t evidence that microwave heating is safe. I wanna roll my eyes as much as next guy, but need to respect objective reporting.
- cycomanic 3y agoThe 5g one was wrong on many levels and very definitely pseudoscience. I also disagree that there is no evidence that microwave heating is safe. There is in fact no real evidence that it isn't safe (and largely no physics mechanism that would suggest otherwise).
- dzhiurgis 3y agoI think it's sometimes argued that you can def cook food using microwaves... But yeah I agree - the "lack of evidence is not evidence" is often used by quacks.
- onetimeuse92304 3y agoYou can also cook food using sunlight. And yet I take walks and run in the sun and I feel perfectly fine. Just because a 5G antenna can heat up humans around it by 0.00001C (I am guessing at the number of zeroes here), is in no way a valid argument that it is bad for us. A study would have to specifically link this kind of microwave radiation to some ill effects, at the dose of 5G installations in use today. As of now, no such study exists.
- jononor 3y agoRepeated UV exposure from sunlight also causes skin cancer. So I am not sure that is the best example...